Comparison
Google Ads vs Meta Ads: Where Your First £1,000 Should Go
Demand capture or demand creation? A decision rule for splitting a first paid budget between Google Ads and Meta, and what each channel is bad at.
360 Digital Promotions 6 min read

One of these platforms shows your advert to someone who has just typed what you sell into a search box. The other shows it to someone scrolling through photographs of their friends’ weekends. That single difference drives almost everything that follows, and it is the reason splitting a first budget evenly between them is usually a mistake.
The decision rule:
If people already search for what you do, put the first £1,000 into Google. Capturing existing demand is the shorter path to a measurable enquiry, and it tells you what your customers actually want in their own words.
If nobody searches for what you do — because it is new, impulse-driven, or visually persuasive — put it into Meta. You cannot capture demand that nobody is expressing.
Test the rule yourself in about two minutes. Open the Google Keyword Planner and look up the plain phrase a customer would type. If there is meaningful monthly volume for terms that describe your service and imply a purchase, Google. If the only volume is for terms describing the problem rather than the solution, Meta.
What Google Ads is genuinely good at
Intent. Someone searching “emergency locksmith Ealing” has a problem right now and a wallet in their hand. You are not persuading them to want something; you are competing to be the one they choose. That shortens everything.
It is also the fastest honest feedback loop in marketing. Within a fortnight of running a tightly targeted campaign you will know which phrases produce enquiries, what a lead costs you, and which of your services people actually ask for. That information is useful well beyond the campaign — it should change the words on your service pages.
What it is bad at is equally clear. It cannot create demand. If your product solves a problem people have not yet named, there is nothing to bid on. Competitive commercial terms in legal, insurance, cosmetic and trades markets can be expensive enough per click that a small budget buys a handful of visits — and if your page converts poorly, that is your entire test budget gone before you have learned anything.
The other honest warning: Google’s defaults are built for Google’s revenue, not yours. Broad match, automatically applied recommendations, Search Partners and Display expansion will all spread your budget wider than you intended. Turning them off is the first hour of competent management.
What Meta Ads is genuinely good at
Interruption, done well. Meta knows an enormous amount about who its users are and what they engage with, and it will show your advert to people who look like the people who already buy from you. Nobody asked to see it, which is both the weakness and the point.
It is comfortably the better platform when the thing you sell can be understood from a picture or a short video. Physical products, food, interiors, fitness, events, anything where seeing it is most of the sale. It is also cheaper per click than competitive search terms, often dramatically so, which means a modest budget buys enough traffic to learn something.
Two capabilities are underrated. Retargeting — showing adverts to people who have already visited your site — is where a large share of Meta’s value sits for small budgets, and it works regardless of which channel sent them in the first place. And lookalike audiences built from a real customer list give you a targeting shortcut that search advertising has no equivalent for.
What Meta is bad at: patience. Interrupted attention converts more slowly. Expect people to see an advert, do nothing, and come back later through a search or a direct visit, which makes attribution messy and makes the platform look worse than it is in a naive report. Creative also fatigues fast — the same image shown to the same audience for six weeks stops working, and you need a supply of new material rather than a single perfect advert.
Splitting a first £1,000
Do not split it evenly. A thousand pounds divided across two platforms and several campaigns is enough data to mislead you and not enough to teach you anything.
Local service businesses. Almost all of it into Google search, tightly targeted to a small radius, with exact and phrase match on the four or five terms that describe what you sell. Keep a small amount back for Meta retargeting once there is traffic to retarget.
Physical products, especially anything visual. Most of it into Meta to test creative and audiences, with a small Google budget on your own brand name and on the two or three most specific product terms.
Considered B2B services. Google first. The search volume is low but the intent is high, and Meta’s targeting struggles to reach a specific job title in a specific sector reliably enough to justify a small budget.
Events and launches. Meta, with a retargeting layer, and Google only on the event name itself.
The part that decides whether either works
Neither platform can fix what happens after the click, and both will happily spend your money finding that out.
Before you launch anything, three things need to be true. Conversion tracking has to work — you must know which clicks became enquiries, not just which became visits, and that means checking it fires rather than assuming. The landing page has to answer the exact query, so an advert for one service should not land on a general homepage. And someone has to answer the phone. A surprising share of wasted ad budget is enquiries that arrived and were never followed up.
If any of those three is missing, fix it before you spend. Our web analytics work exists mostly because campaigns get judged on numbers that were never set up correctly.
When paid advertising is the wrong call entirely
If your margin per sale is thin and your average order value is small, the arithmetic may simply not work, and no amount of optimisation rescues it. Work out what you can afford to pay for a customer before you start, not after.
If your website converts badly, advertising makes the problem more expensive rather than solving it. Fix the page first.
And if the £1,000 is the last £1,000 you have, do not spend it on ads. Paid media is a way to accelerate something that already works, not a way to rescue something that does not.
If you want a view on which of the two suits your business, that is what our Google Ads and social media marketing pages describe. Or tell us what you sell on the get started page and we will give you a straight answer.